Welcome to Legal Help
Home Alabama DUI Laws Administrative Review Hearings in Alabama

Free Help – Ask Your DUI Questions

legal dui questions

Choose a State

Administrative Review Hearings in Alabama

An administrative hearing is separate from a trial and has to do with license suspension. A license to drive is a privilege and not a right, so the Department of Public Safety can suspend or revoke your license without giving you a trial first. If your license was revoked because you refused a test, then the officer takes your license and issues you a 45-day temporary license on a yellow paper. Follow the directions on that paper to challenge and try to get your license back.

In Alabama, any driver whose license is suspended or revoked by the department of commerce and regulation has the right to file for a hearing within 10 days of the revocation to have their driver’s license reinstated.  During the hearing that results, the court will examine the facts of the case as well as take testimony from any relevant witnesses or parties.  After such information is collected, the court will decide if the driver’s license should remain revoked or suspended.

In Alabama, a driver who refuses to take a chemical blood test may file a petition for an administrative hearing regarding the revocation of his license (recall that based on the Alabama implied consent law, all drivers in the state have consented to such chemical testing).  During the hearing, the director of the division of commercial inspection and regulation will review the facts and circumstances of the situation.  The director may conclude that the arresting officer complied with all relevant laws and that the driver of the vehicle made the chemical test refusal.  In such a scenario, the director shall revoke the driver’s license for the prescribed period.  The director has the further discretion to determine if the convicted driver will retain driving privileges with regard to employment or other commitments.  If the director determines, however, that the arresting officer did not comply with all relevant laws in the arrest, then the driver may be able to avoid the penalties associated with his conviction.

The director will review any evidence with a substantial connection to the crime and consider it relevant to the proceeding.  This includes evidence offered by expert witnesses and lay witnesses alike.  The court has the discretion to admit the opinions of expert testimony, while lay-witness opinions must further the understanding of the testimony or an issue of fact involved in the case.  In other words, the court is more skeptical of the comments made by random witnesses on the scene as opposed to expert witnesses.


If you have any questions about speeding tickets, please ask them at our legal help forum. free legal questions

Ask Questions, Get Answers

free legal help forum

Contact a DUI Lawyer Today!